Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare > Volume 14, Number 8 > Pp. 427-434

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Careau, E. Articles by Noreau, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Assessing interprofessional teamwork in a videoconference-based telerehabilitation setting

Emmanuelle Careau ^*  , Claude Vincent   and Luc Noreau  

^* Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Québec; Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Québec, Canada

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1 Research framework

 

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2 Example of sociograms

 

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3 Percentage of time dedicated to the topics of discussion. The boxes show the 25th and 75th centiles, with the median inside the box; the whiskers indicate the 90th and the 10th percentiles. The topics were: (a) Client's situation and significant changes; (b) Recommendations to the regional team; (c) Client's expectation and priorities; (d) Prognosis for social participation; (e) Welcome and meeting; (f) Relatives' expectation and priorities; (g) Progress toward meeting the objectives; (h) Intervention methods; (i) New objectives; (j) Next meeting plan; (k) Summary of last meeting; and (l) Other topics *P < 0.05

 

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4 Intervention rate for each participant. The boxes show the 25th and 75th centiles, with the median inside the box; the whiskers indicate the 90th and the 10th percentiles. The participant types were: (a) Clinic coordinators (specialized centre); (b) Clinic coordinators (regional centre); (c) Clients; (d) Relatives; (e) Occupational therapists (specialized centre); (f) Physician (specialized centre); (g) Physiotherapists (specialized centre); (h) Neuropsychologists (specialized centre); (i) Social workers (specialized centre); (j) Other health-care workers *P < 0.05

 

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?