RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:330-334
doi:10.1258/1357633001936003
© 2000 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tachakra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Uche, C. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Article

A follow-up study of remote trauma teleconsultations

Sapal Tachakra, Maria Loane and Chris Uko Uche


Accident and Emergency Services, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Online Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia; Accident and Emergency Services, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK

We conducted a follow-up study of patients who had attended a nurse-led minor accident and treatment service (MATS) and who had participated in a teleconsultation. Over three and a half years, 31,510 patients had attended the MATS unit and 1854 patients (5.9%) of these had participated in a teleconsultation. Of the 1854 telemedicine patients, 1199 had been referred to hospital or clinic and 1153 had actually attended. Retrospective examination of the relevant hospital records showed that in 25 cases (2%) the original telediagnosis was considered incorrect at face-to-face review and that treatment was either begun or changed in 264 cases (23%). All patients, including those discharged home after the teleconsultation, were sent a questionnaire about any changes to their injury. Of the 655 patients discharged home, a questionnaire response was obtained from 598 (91%). Following discharge, 43 of these patients had sought help from another health-care provider (the majority from their general practitioner). Of the 46 patients referred to hospital who did not keep their follow-up appointments, questionnaire results were obtained from 35 (76%). Nine of these patients had sought help from another health-care provider (the majority from their general practitioner) but there had been no change in diagnosis or treatment. Our findings suggest that teleconsultations are an effective means of delivering minor injuries care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
O. Saqui, A. Chang, S. McGonigle, B. Purdy, L. Fairholm, M. Baun, M. Yeung, P. Rossos, and J. Allard
Telehealth Videoconferencing: Improving Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Care to Rural Areas of Ontario, Canada
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2007; 31(3): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Walking London's Medical History