RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 1998;4:1-17
doi:10.1258/1357633981931227
© 1998 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A survey of research in telemedicine. 1: Telemedicine systems

P Taylor

Published work in telemedicine has been surveyed in order to consider the range of current research, highlight some pitfalls and point out areas where it seems that more work is required. This article deals with tests of the safety and efficacy of telemedicine systems. This work can be seen as moving through three phases: first, identify the technical specification of equipment required for the particular telemedicine application; second, test that this is appropriate in particular settings; third, establish a set of standards and guidelines to ensure that the telemedicine system is used to the best advantage. Work in teleradiology seems to be in the second phase. Work in teledermatology, for example, is still in the first phase. Telemedicine is an important and growing area of academic research. The quality of the research ought also to be increasing. While there have been a number of well designed, robust studies with clear conclusions that show the value of telemedicine in certain settings, much more remains to be done.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
M Vitacca, M Mazzu, and S Scalvini
Socio-technical and organizational challenges to wider e-Health implementation
Chronic Respiratory Disease, May 1, 2009; 6(2): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
J. L van den Brink, P. W Moorman, M. F de Boer, W. C J Hop, J. F A Pruyn, C. D A Verwoerd, and J. H van Bemmel
Impact on Quality of Life of a Telemedicine System Supporting Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Controlled Trial During the Postoperative Period at Home
JAMIA, March 1, 2007; 14(2): 198 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Informatics JournalHome page
C. J. Urquhart, R. A. Currell, and P. J. Wainwright
Evidence-based policy making in health informatics: indications from systematic reviews of nursing record systems and telemedicine
Health Informatics Journal, December 1, 2000; 6(4): 204 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Informatics JournalHome page
C. May, M. Mort, F. Mair, N. T. Ellis, and L. Gask
Evaluation of new technologies in health-care systems: what's the context?
Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2000; 6(2): 67 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]