RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:409-413
doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.090501
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinlich, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walcher, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

RESEARCH

Original articles

Telemedical assistance for in-flight emergencies on intercontinental commercial aircraft

Michael Weinlich * , Nadine Nieuwkamp *, Uwe Stueben {dagger}, Ingo Marzi * and Felix Walcher *


* Department of Trauma Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main; {dagger} Medical Department, Lufthansa German Airlines, Frankfurt/Main, Germany


Correspondence: Dr Michael Weinlich, Hopfenweg 9, D – 72072 Tübingen, Germany (Fax: +49 7121 433 6619; Email: michael.weinlich{at}t-online.de)


We have conducted a three-year prospective study of medical incidents on a commercial airline. A telemedicine service was available via an on-board satellite phone. During the study period there were 3364 medical incidents. The most common incident was collapse (n = 2310, 57%). Telemedicine was used in 323 of the cases (9%). Neurological patients, mostly stroke and seizures, excluding psychiatric diseases, were seen in 27% of the telemedicine cases (n = 83). Most of the cases involved middle-aged people, not the elderly. The group of patients that needed diversion (n = 27) was compared to the cases staying on board (n = 275). None of the patients in the non-diversion group deteriorated. All unstable patients forced a diversion. Doctors on board used the service in more severe cases, whereas laymen used the service in less severe cases. The results of the present study demonstrate the advantage of using simple teleconsultation in cases of medical emergency on board an aircraft.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?