RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:145-149
doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.003013
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, W.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, S. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

PAPERS

A portable dental image viewer using a mobile network to provide a tele-dental service

Wonse Park *, Dong-Keun Kim {dagger}, Jung-Chae Kim {dagger}, Kee-Deog Kim * and Sun K Yoo {dagger} 


* Department of General Dentistry, Human Identification Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul; {dagger} Department of Medical Engineering, Center for Emergency Medical Informatics, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea


Correspondence: Professor Sun K Yoo, Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120–752, Korea (Fax: +82 2 363 9923; Email: sunkyoo{at}yuhs.ac)


We tested three imaging devices for suitability in emergency dental situations for telemedicine. The three devices were a special-purpose oral camera, a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera, and the built-in camera of a mobile phone. A total of 20 subjects volunteered to take part in the study. We simulated five different conditions which could affect the quality of the image and measured image transmission times across two widely available mobile networks (a CDMA-based 3G network and a Wireless Broadband Network, WiBRO). The DSLR produced the best quality images, although it was a relatively large device and not easy to use. The oral camera failed to give satisfactory images under certain conditions (i.e. without extra lighting, out of focus and head motion). In contrast, the mobile phone based camera was very easy to use and to handle, and it gave good information for initial diagnosis, even at high compression ratios. If the image acquisition conditions are carefully set up, this device might be the best for emergency dental trauma situations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic