RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:125-128
doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.003006
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Istepanian, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Earle, K. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

PAPERS

Evaluation of a mobile phone telemonitoring system for glycaemic control in patients with diabetes

Robert SH Istepanian *, Karima Zitouni *, Diane Harry {dagger}, Niva Moutosammy {dagger}, Ala Sungoor *, Bee Tang * and Kenneth A Earle {dagger} 


* Mobile Information and Network Technologies Centre, Kingston University, London; {dagger} St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK


Correspondence: Dr K A Earle, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London SW17 ORE, UK (Fax: +44 20 8725 1353; Email: k.earle{at}sgul.ac.uk)


We conducted a randomized controlled trial using mobile health technology in an ethnically diverse sample of 137 patients with complicated diabetes. Patients in the intervention group (n = 72) were trained to measure their blood glucose with a sensor which transmitted the readings to a mobile phone via a Bluetooth wireless link. Clinicians were then able to examine and respond to the readings which were viewed with a web-based application. Patients in the control arm of the study (n = 65) did not transmit their readings and received care with their usual doctor in the outpatient and/or primary care setting. The mean follow-up period was 9 months in each group. The default rate was higher in the patients in the intervention arm due to technical problems. In an intention-to-treat analysis there were no differences in HbA1c between the intervention and control groups. In a sub-group analysis of the patients who completed the study, the telemonitoring group had a lower HbA1c than those in the control group: 7.76% and 8.40%, respectively (P = 0.06).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MRI of the Whole Body