RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:1-6
doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.008004
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonnardot, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rainis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

EDUCATION & PRACTICE

Technology

Store-and-forward telemedicine for doctors working in remote areas

Laurent Bonnardot  and Roberto Rainis


Polar Station, Antarctica


Correspondence: Dr Laurent Bonnardot, European Space Agency (ESA), Medical Service T.A.A.F / I.P.E.V, 34 boulevard de Sébastopol, 75004 Paris, France (Fax: +33 1 56 91 50 35; Email: lbonnardot{at}free.fr)


For doctors working in remote areas, access to medical specialists is crucial in order to provide patients with the best possible health care. Telemedicine is now widely used to obtain second opinions from consultants and is a mainstay of the organization of health care in Antarctica. Taking advantage of our extreme geographical isolation on a polar station, we tested the possibilities for obtaining specialist advice by telemedicine based on email. Two virtual case reports with one question each were sent to six correspondents: two non-governmental organizations (NGOs), two personal acquaintances and two institutions. Initial email replies were received between 13 hours and 7 days later. There were three kinds of reply: well argued and well adapted to our situation (one NGO); argued but not well adapted to our situation (one NGO, one acquaintance and one institution); and a short reply without argument (one acquaintance). Contacting personal acquaintances was not as reliable as we had expected. The best support was provided by one of the NGOs whose efficiency was based on the use of an automatic message-handling system and a team of specialists well trained in giving advice to isolated doctors. This NGO demonstrated how a store-and-forward telemedicine system can be efficient and reliable; the study also highlighted some limitations in other methods of obtaining specialist advice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor