RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:396-400
doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.007017
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tränkler, U.
Right arrow Articles by Horsch, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

RESEARCH

Original articles

Video quality of 3G videophones for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Uwe Tränkler * , Oddvar Hagen {dagger} and Alexander Horsch * {ddagger}


* Technische Universität München, Germany; {dagger} Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, Tromso, Norway; {ddagger} University of Tromsø, Norway


Correspondence: Professor Alexander Horsch, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany (Fax: +49 89 4140 4974; Email: alexander.horsch{at}tum.de)


We simulated a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) scene with a manikin and used two 3G videophones on the caller's side to transmit video to a laptop PC. Five observers (two doctors with experience in emergency medicine and three paramedics) evaluated the video. They judged whether the manikin was breathing and whether they would give advice for CPR; they also graded the confidence of their decision-making. Breathing was only visible from certain orientations of the videophones, at distances below 150 cm with good illumination and a still background. Since the phones produced a degradation in colours and shadows, detection of breathing mainly depended on moving contours. Low camera positioning produced better results than having the camera high up. Darkness, shaking of the camera and a moving background made detection of breathing almost impossible. The video from the two 3G videophones that were tested was of sufficient quality for telephone CPR provided that camera orientation, distance, illumination and background were carefully chosen. Thus it seems possible to use 3G videophones for emergency calls involving CPR. However, further studies on the required video quality in different scenarios are necessary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MRI of the Whole Body