Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare > Volume 14, Number 6 > Pp. 322-325

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Varkey, P. Articles by Hagen, P. T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

RESEARCH Original articles

Telemedicine in the work site: a study of feasibility, and patient and provider satisfaction

Prathibha Varkey , Kay Schumacher, Claudia Swanton, Barbara Timm and Philip T Hagen

Division of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence: Dr Prathibha Varkey, Mayo Clinic, Baldwin 5A, 200 1st SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA (Fax: +1 507 284 4251; Email: Varkey.prathibha{at}mayo.edu)

We examined the use of telemedicine for improving access to care in a work-site clinic. A prospective study of 100 patients was conducted over a four-month period in a work site that housed 700 employees. Sinusitis (10 visits), upper respiratory tract infections (9 visits), otitis media (9 visits), hypertension (9 visits) and back pain (8 visits) were the most common reasons for the visits. In 99 visits, clinicians were of the opinion that the telemedicine visit felt similar to a face-to-face visit. For most of the visits (67), patients strongly agreed or agreed that telemedicine had a positive effect on their relationship with the health-care provider. The otoscope, microscope and stethoscope telemedicine peripherals were important in aiding diagnosis (and ruling out other causes) in about 55% of the visits (upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, otitis media, cough, sore throat, nevi, rhinitis and ear wax related concerns). The ability for the patient to watch their ENT examination and see any associated abnormalities was appreciated by many patients. Physicians, nurses and patients were capable of using the technology with little training.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?