RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:282-284
doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.080416
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLean, T. R
Right arrow Articles by McLean, A. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

EDUCATION & PRACTICE

Overview

Hageseth's principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction and international telemedicine

Thomas R McLean * {dagger}  and Alexander B McLean {dagger}


* Eastern Kansas Health Care System, Leavenworth, Kansas; {dagger} Third Millennium Consultants, LLC, Shawnee, Kansas, USA


Correspondence: Thomas R McLean, Eastern Kansas Health Care System, Surgical Service, 4101 S Fourth Street Trafficway, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048, USA (Fax: +1 913 758 4185; Email: Thomas.McLean{at}va.gov)


At what point does an international telemedicine transaction create a sufficient commercial nexus to allow one country the authority to impose its laws on a foreign telemedicine providers? Some light on this matter was shed by the US case of Hageseth versus Superior Court. The authority for extraterritorial jurisdiction is found in the US Constitution, which requires the states to cooperate in matters of law enforcement. Similar cooperation from foreign nations cannot be expected. Unless a defendant is charged with a capital offence, nations are rarely willing to extradite their citizens. As the unlicensed practice of medicine is not a capital offence, it is unlikely that an unlicensed telemedicine provider would be extradited to the US. Because low-volume unlicensed offshore telemedicine providers are unlikely to be extradited or to be subject to trade sanctions, they may be able to operate beyond the law.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Acute CT - A Primer of Emergency Imaging