Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare > Volume 14, Number 4 > Pp. 190-194

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kane, R. L Articles by Wallin, M. T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

RESEARCH Original articles

Teleneurology in patients with multiple sclerosis: EDSS ratings derived remotely and from hands-on examination

Robert L Kane ^*  , Christopher T Bever ^* , Mary Ehrmantraut ^*, Alan Forte , William J Culpepper ^*  and Mitchell T Wallin  

^* VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland; Washington, DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA

Correspondence: Dr Robert L Kane, VA Medical Center, MS Center of Excellence (127), 10 N. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA (Fax: +1 410 605 7705; Email: robert.kane{at}va.gov)

We compared the telemedicine assessment of 20 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with the findings of a hands-on examiner. The remote specialist was a neurologist with expertise in MS; the hands-on examination was performed by an experienced mid-level practitioner. We also compared the findings of a second specialist viewing the examination in the room with the patient. The videoconference link operated at a bandwidth of 384 kbit/s. All three examiners independently completed a standardized rating scale for neurological functions. Cronbach's for the three raters' total expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score was 0.99 with individual correlations ranging from 0.96–0.97. Agreement between raters for individual neurological domain scores was more variable. The most consistent assessments were for optic, bowel and bladder, and cerebral functions. The least consistent were for cerebellar and brain stem functions. Agreement between the remote and local examiners was similar to that reported for different neurological examiners directly assessing the same patient using the EDSS rating system.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?