Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare > Volume 14, Number 4 > Pp. 186-189

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kummervold, P. E. Articles by Holthe, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

RESEARCH Original articles

Communicating textual health information to the mobile phones of visually-impaired users

Per Egil Kummervold  and Halgeir Holthe

Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, Tromsø, Norway

Correspondence: Per Egil Kummervold, Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, PO Box 35, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway, (Fax: +47 77 754 098; Email: per.egil.kummervold{at}telemed.no)

We investigated how short messages communicating health information would best be distributed to people with vision difficulties using mobile phones. Twelve visually-impaired persons who were unable to read short message service (SMS) messages directly compared three methods of presenting text messages as speech: (1) ordinary SMS messages were sent to the users and converted into speech by the mobile phone; (2) multimedia messages were sent to the users with prerecorded speech-synthesized information; and (3) mobile phone calls were placed to the users and prerecorded speech-synthesized messages were streamed to them. The latter two approaches used server-generated sound files. Over a three-month trial period, we sent a total of 88 SMS messages to the subjects, 111 multimedia messaging service (MMS) messages and 104 telephone calls. All of the SMS messages, 88% of the MMS messages and 69% of the telephone calls were received. In subsequent interviews, we asked the users which presentation method they preferred. SMS scored significantly better than both MMS (P = 0.033) and telephones (P = 0.006). All three methods had serious drawbacks. However, the study suggests that it might be possible to develop suitable technology for communicating with people with vision difficulties by mobile phone.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?