RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:157-159
doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.003019
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urwin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

PAPERS

A five-year review of ground-to-air emergency medical advice

Alastair Urwin * , James Ferguson {dagger}, Roderick McDonald {ddagger} and Susan Fraser *


* Department of Emergency Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen; {dagger} Scottish Centre for Telehealth, Foresterhill, Aberdeen; {ddagger} International Centre for Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK


Correspondence: Dr A Urwin, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK (Fax: +44 1224 550 718; Email: a.urwin{at}doctors.org.uk)


We reviewed five years' experience of providing ground-to-air medical advice for commercial passenger aircraft. A total of 273 events occurred in-flight where further advice was sought. The most common age group resulting in calls were from those aged 21–30 years, who generated 38 calls (16%). The 273 cases included gastrointestinal conditions (26%), neurological (22%) and cardiovascular events (14%). Most incidents were managed conservatively in-flight with oxygen and/or other medications. Aircraft diversion occurred on 9% of occasions; cardiovascular and neurological emergencies were the major cause of this. Collaboration between aviation providers should be considered to develop a common database of in-flight emergencies so that contents of medical kits can be standardized in order to improve the quality of care in the air.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic