RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:17-21
doi:10.1258/jtt.2007.070511
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katalinic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Raspe, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

RESEARCH

Original article

The TeleGuard trial of additional telemedicine care in CAD patients. 1 Utilization of the system

Alexander Katalinic *, Annika Waldmann * , Bernhard Schwaab {dagger}, Gert Richardt {ddagger}, Abdolhamid Sheikhzadeh * {ddagger} and Heiner Raspe *


* Institute for Social Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck; {dagger} Curschmann-Klinik, Timmendorfer Strand; {ddagger} Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany


Correspondence: Dr Annika Waldmann, University of Luebeck, Institute for Social Medicine, Institute for Cancer Epidemiology e.V. Beckergrube 43-47, 23552 Luebeck, Germany (Fax: +49 451 799 2551; Email: Annika.Waldmann{at}krebsregister-sh.de)


Patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) were recruited in 11 hospitals and randomized to an intervention (telemedicine system; n = 752) or a control group (usual medical care; n = 748). On the day before discharge, patients in the intervention group were equipped with a 12-lead event recorder and trained to use the device. Whenever they had symptoms, they could contact the call centre, transmit an ECG (without redialling) and consult a physician. During a 12-month study, 171 patients (23%) in the intervention group contacted the call centre, a total of 269 times. The main reasons for calling were chest pain and radiating pain. Pathological changes were seen in 24% of the transmitted ECGs. Only 23% of the calls were made in the first hour after onset of symptoms and a further 12% in the subsequent hour, suggesting that patients should be encouraged to use ECG transmission at an earlier stage. At follow-up, 157 patients (21%) had had at least one recurrent cardiac event (myocardial infarction, cardiac hospital stay, re-vascularization). The proportion was significantly higher in telemedicine users (35%) than in non-users (17%), P < 0.001. Regardless of utilization, the majority of the intervention patients considered that the telemedicine system was helpful (users = 93%, non-users = 89%; P = 0.095).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
A. Waldmann, A. Katalinic, B. Schwaab, G. Richardt, A. Sheikhzadeh, and H. Raspe
The TeleGuard trial of additional telemedicine care in CAD patients. 2 Morbidity and mortality after 12 months
J Telemed Telecare, April 1, 2008; 14(1): 22 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition