RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:46-49
doi:10.1258/1357633054461552
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courreges, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bru, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers

Clinical trials and evaluation of a mobile, robotic tele-ultrasound system

Fabien Courreges, Pierre Vieyres, Robert S H Istepanian, Philippe Arbeille and Conxita Bru


Laboratory of Vision and Robotics, Université d'Orléans, France; Kingston University, London, UK; Laboratory of Vision and Robotics, Université d'Orléans, France; Kingston University, London, UK; Université de Tours, UMPS, Tours, France; Corporacio Sanitaria Clinic (CSC), Barcelona, Spain

We have developed a robotic tele-ultrasound system (OTELO) that allows an expert to examine a distant patient by ultrasound. At the expert station, a sonographer controls a virtual probe. Movements are reproduced at the patient station, which may be several kilometres away, on a real probe held by a lightweight robot, which is positioned on the patient by a paramedic. Two medical teams tested the tele-ultrasound system at two different hospitals on a total of 52 patients. Except for some difficulties caused by particular conditions, the diagnosis obtained with the remote scanning system agreed in at least 80% of the cases with the diagnosis made by conventional scanning. The results demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the device.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Walking London's Medical History