RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:14-16
doi:10.1258/1357633054461930
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scalvini, S
Right arrow Articles by Glisenti, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers

Cardiac event recording yields more diagnoses than 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations

S Scalvini, E Zanelli, G Martinelli, D Baratti, A Giordano and F Glisenti


Cardiology Division, S Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Gussago, Brescia, Italy; Cardiology Division, S Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Gussago, Brescia, Italy; Cardiology Division, S Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Gussago, Brescia, Italy; Cardiology Division, S Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Gussago, Brescia, Italy; Cardiology Division, S Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Gussago, Brescia, Italy; Health Telematic Network S.p.A., Brescia, Italy

Palpitation is a common symptom that sometimes results from a substantial cardiac arrhythmia. We compared the diagnostic yield of trans-telephonic event monitors with those of Holter monitoring in patients with intermittent palpitations. In all, 310 patients were randomly assigned to receive an event recorder or 24-hour Holter monitoring. Event recorders were used for seven days or until two recordings were obtained while symptoms occurred. The main end-point was an electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded during symptoms. The patients with palpitation recorded the one-lead ECG trace and sent it to a telemedicine call centre, where a nurse responded. There were 119 symptomatic patients in the event recorder group and 74 in the Holter group. The total costs were {euro}6019 for event recording and {euro}9605 for Holter monitoring. The average costs were {euro}51 per symptomatic patient detected by event recorder monitoring and {euro}130 per symptomatic patient detected by Holter monitoring. More patients therefore received a clear diagnosis, and more quickly, when using event recording than with Holter monitoring. For this reason, event recorders are preferable to Holter monitors for patients with palpitations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. Thavendiranathan, A. Bagai, C. Khoo, P. Dorian, and N. K. Choudhry
Does This Patient With Palpitations Have a Cardiac Arrhythmia?
JAMA, November 18, 2009; 302(19): 2135 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



MDU Exam Doctor