RSM logo
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Telemed Telecare 2004;10:48-50
doi:10.1258/1357633042614186
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hockey, A D
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers

Evaluation of a pilot second-opinion child telepsychiatry service

A D Hockey, P M Yellowlees and S Murphy


Centre for Online Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Online Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Child and Family Therapy Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

A second-opinion child psychiatry service was piloted for six months in the northern-most two-thirds of Queensland. It provided specialist expertise by telehealth to local multidisciplinary teams of mental health staff. During the study period, 28 videoconferences were performed by the service: nine for administrative purposes, two for educational purposes, and 17 for direct and indirect clinical applications. The mean time between a referral being made and a consultation being performed was 4.7 days (range 1–13). A survey administered to referring and non-referring mental health workers showed that the major barriers to service implementation included the limited allied health applications that were offered, a perceived lack of communication during the implementation phase of the service, and the creation of a new referral network that did not conform to traditional referral patterns in the north of Queensland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
D. Hailey, A. Ohinmaa, and R. Roine
Limitations in the routine use of telepsychiatry
J Telemed Telecare, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 28 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
R. Hakak and R. Szeftel
Clinical Use of Telemedicine in Child Psychiatry
Focus, July 1, 2008; 6(3): 293 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



MDU Exam Doctor